I finished reading "The Last Merovingian" of Jim Hougan and I did not like . Well, if I liked it, but little else. I expected more.
had read several reviews in which it described as "style da vinci code, but written before and better "and for my taste there was nothing better. perhaps in English texts are better than these gentlemen seem critical, but in English found no difference, and had even translated strangely parties, which did not happen with that of Dan Brown.
comparisons aside and focusing only on this book , uneven as it seemed to me to stay alert and interested. The first 50 or 60 pages were a drag. All very slow, much description, boring . Just after the first part gives a light of the "problem", the central issue of what really mattered. Here begins the book in truth, principle could be a prologue too long: D
Still, there are passages in which everything flows quickly, it catches you, you want to keep reading and learn more ... but suddenly, there is a brake and back to slow and boring ... there just want to skip pages simplmente ... Nearing the end appears
drawbacks. When you begin to solve problems, to unlock the mysteries and all that, things seem to happen too fast and left the sensations even of the author neglected parts ... parts you want to hear to complete the puzzle and understand everything, but here are passing by as if it mattered (but of course, if you describe an imported park idiot, ha ha)
Anyway, I amused myself anyway, but let me warmly " ya, y? " ... if I had to choose, I'll take The DaVinci Code, with everything Hollywood can be, entertained me more and even made me go visit wikipedia, the Luvre and read about history and art ... this other not : P
Prefer not have details of the plot to not inadvertently reveal a little secret ... ultra condensed version would be: Spies, CIA, conspiracies, Merovingians, murderers escape across Europe by the hand of a beautiful girl, strange connections made "historic" ... as he said, much like the DaVinci Code. -----
2 books and go into " Campaign." We only have 18 ... yeahhh
0 comments:
Post a Comment